Mansell, Engel & Cole
  • Home
  • About
    • Steven S. Mansell
    • Mark A. Engel
    • Kenneth G. Cole
    • Keith F. Givens
    • Adam Engel
    • Zachary K. Housel
  • Practice Areas
    • Denied Claims & Disputes
    • Types Of Insurance
  • Case Results
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page

A potential problem for long-term disability claimants

On behalf of Mansell, Engel & Cole | Dec 29, 2017 | Denied Insurance Claims

If you are disabled and collecting payments under a long-term disability policy, that’s pretty much a done deal, right?

That is, there should be no challenge to your claim by an insurer once you have — and continue to be — medically verified as unable to perform your customary work owing to injury or illness.

Ah, were life so simple. A recent article on a common insurance company tactic employed to deny LTD benefits  notes that approved claimants must often be “wary and aware” of the potential for post-approval claim denial based on often controversial policy language.

What that article focuses on is the “own occupation” versus “any occupation” distinction that can arise in a policy.

Here’s the bottom line. Some policies state that a claimant can continue to receive LTD benefits while unable to perform in a particular occupation. That means that, say, a dentist who is receiving a disability check can continue to do so as long as he or she cannot work as a dentist.

Conversely, an “any occupation” provision can deny that professional LTD benefits if he or she is able to work in virtually any field. The above-cited overview references “potential employability in all potential vocations.”

It is hardly surprising to note that insurers will often try to render that “any occupation” verbiage applicable to a claimant’s case, even when a claim has been initially approved. They do so by attempting to “transition” an own-occupation policy to an any-occupation policy some time after benefits are already being received.

Many of our readers will likely point to that as being patently unfair — even underhanded and illegal.

Attempted claimant denial based on any number of factors is a common reality in the insurance industry. Consumers rightly seeking to fight back can contact a proven policyholders’ insurance law attorney for prompt and aggressive advocacy.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Recent Posts

  • Contesting a home insurance claim denial or settlement
  • Fighting a denied earthquake insurance claim
  • Overview of Oklahoma’s bad faith laws
  • Common reasons why health insurance denies claims
  • When a life insurance company denies a claim

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016

Categories

  • Blog
  • Denied Insurance Claims
  • Firm News
  • Insurance
  • Insurance Disputes

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Start Your
Free Insurance
Claim Review

Mansell, Engel & Cole The Insurance Attorneys

Office Address

204 N. Robinson Ave.
21st Floor
Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Map & Directions

Get In Touch

Phone: 405-212-5921
Fax: 405-232-4140

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
IBFTLA - Insurance Bad Faith Trial Lawyers Association
Member of The National Trial Lawyers - Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AV Preeminent Rated Lawyers
Review Us

© 2021 Mansell, Engel & Cole. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters