Mansell, Engel & Cole
  • Home
  • About
    • Steven S. Mansell
    • Mark A. Engel
    • Kenneth G. Cole
    • Keith F. Givens
    • Adam Engel
    • Zachary K. Housel
  • Practice Areas
    • Denied Claims & Disputes
    • Types Of Insurance
  • Case Results
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page

Bad faith not even an arguable proposition in this insurance matter

On behalf of Mansell, Engel & Cole | Apr 29, 2019 | Insurance Disputes

A federal judge recently decided to bypass a jury’s input on a key question relevant to an insurance dispute. Instead, the court ruled in a summary judgment outcome that an insurer clearly acted in bad faith in its treatment of a policyholder’s claim.

The claimant is a church and connected business that together leased a building. The plaintiff had paid nearly $3 million in mortgage payments on the property when the owner reclaimed it in a sheriff’s sale owing to the plaintiff’s failure to continue making timely payments.

What brought the property-linked dispute to court was a massive water leak on the property that occurred some months prior to the sheriff’s action. The church had made a timely insurance claim for property damages, but the insurance adjuster raised challenges against it.

A key argument was that the property was vacant when the damage occurred, which triggered a non-payment “vacancy” provision in the insurance contract. The plaintiff presented proofs that, while the building was not being fully used, it was still partially occupied for various uses. The resulting lawsuit against the insurer argued that the company’s vacancy argument was a mere pretext to stall the claim.

And stalling is exactly what the insurer did, egregiously violating a state law mandating that progress reports on unpaid claims be sent to insured parties every 45 days. The insurer had gone beyond that time limit four times without ever addressing the matter. The court found that inactivity to be purposeful and in bad faith.

The case is still partially before a jury, which will decide applicable damages and bad-faith conduct that the insurer might have engaged in during additional periods. The plaintiff parties are seeking at least $2.8 million for property payments made on the building, $1.2 million in lost equity and rents, and punitive damages.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Recent Posts

  • Fighting a denied earthquake insurance claim
  • Overview of Oklahoma’s bad faith laws
  • Common reasons why health insurance denies claims
  • When a life insurance company denies a claim
  • The importance of additional documentation after a denied claim

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016

Categories

  • Blog
  • Denied Insurance Claims
  • Firm News
  • Insurance
  • Insurance Disputes

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Start Your
Free Insurance
Claim Review

Mansell, Engel & Cole The Insurance Attorneys

Office Address

204 N. Robinson Ave.
21st Floor
Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Map & Directions

Get In Touch

Phone: 405-212-5921
Fax: 405-232-4140

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
IBFTLA - Insurance Bad Faith Trial Lawyers Association
Member of The National Trial Lawyers - Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AV Preeminent Rated Lawyers
Review Us

© 2021 Mansell, Engel & Cole. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters